Labour seeks Police investigation on TV One report
[posted 3 Feb 2005, 1600]
Labour Leader Mahendra Chaudhry has written to the
Police asking for an investigation into a Fiji TV One report which
predicted the possibility of a Labour win in the next general elections
leading to opposition and instability.
TV One claimed the report was compiled by “a company”
but did not divulge its name, hiding behind the pretext of legal
constraints in not doing so.
The Fiji Labour Party views the report as an attempt to
instill fear and intimidate the voter ahead of the 2006 general
elections.
Mr. Chaudhry told the Police Commissioner the report has
serious implications on national security and may undermine the process of
free and fair elections.
The ‘report’ predicted that a resurgent Labour Party
was likely to win the 2006 general elections but that the Labour
Government would implement policies “hostile to the Gujerati business
community”. It also claimed that a Labour win would lead to opposition
and destabilisation from the indigenous community.
This is highly irresponsible and unethical reporting,
deliberately concocted to create mischief and alienate the business
community. The Fiji Labour Party does not have policies “hostile to the
business community”. Indeed, the Labour Party does not discriminate on
the basis of class, creed or colour.
If anything, the business community did very well in the
one year that the Labour-led Government was in power. The Party assures
the business community that its polices are not hostile and that, indeed,
it needs their support to once again revive the economy and bring back the
dynamism experienced during its one year in office.
Likewise, the indigenous community was better off under
the humanitarian policies of the People’s Coalition Government. In any
case, the Police are dealing effectively with elements who have a tendency
to create instability to pursue their own personal agendas.
TV One has a responsibility to reveal the authorship of
this so-called report and the name of the company that commissioned or
compiled it, if this report has to have any credibility.
Otherwise, the Fiji Labour Party will be forced to view
it as irresponsible and sensationalist journalism designed to create fear
and voter intimidation ahead of the 2006 general elections. It is clearly
a move to undermine the process of democracy in this country.
“Such an unsourced report, with its implications on
national security, is highly unethical. This is why the FLP has been
calling for the establishment of a Media Standards Committee so that
complaints of such nature can be dealt with swiftly,” Mr. Chaudhry told
the local media.
“TV One’s obvious bias in handling this report is
evident from the fact that they did not seek my reaction to it. This was
despite the fact that they came to me for an interview yesterday,” he
said.
In his letter to the Police Commissioner, Mr. Chaudhry
said the FLP was very concerned at such propaganda being unleashed
ahead of the 2006 general elections.
"It is undoubtedly designed to create fear and to
intimidate the voters. It also undermines the democratic process in our
country and the prospect of free and fair elections.
Because of its grave implications to national security
and a possible destabilisation plan of action following the general
elections, or even in the lead up to it, the FLP believes the Police must
look into the matter.
It is irresponsible and mischievous of Fiji TV to run an
unsourced report on a matter that concerns national security. If the
report has credibility and is authentic, and not just a political ploy to
intimidate the voter, why hide the name of the company that commissioned
or compiled it?
The Fiji Labour Party has twice been the victim of coups
that took away its legitimate and democratically won right to govern the
country. We are therefore on the alert for any moves to spread adverse
propaganda that could undermine the process of free and fair elections or
create instability post-elections.
We believe this particular news item by Fiji TV merits
Police investigation. Is the author of the report privy to information
that could undermine national security, of which the Police and the
security forces are unaware?
Or is this, as we suspect, tactics to intimidate the
voter and undermine the democratic process? Both are criminal intents and
should be investigated. The Police needs to obtain a copy of the so-called
report and conduct its own inquiries into the matter.
We live in a democratic society and the people of Fiji
are entitled to know the truth about matters that impinge on national
security and their individual rights." |