Elections Office told to consider Labour’s concerns
[posted 14 March 2006, 1730]
The Elections Office has been instructed by the Electoral
Commission to address concerns raised by the Labour Party regarding non
compliance with the Electoral Act.
Electoral Commissioner Graham Leung has written to Labour
Leader Mahendra Chaudhry to say that he had instructed Elections Supervisor
Semesa Karavaki to address the concerns raised by Mr Chaudhry.
Mr. Leung expects to get back to Mr. Chaudhry in 48 hours.
If the Labour Party’s complaints are upheld, the 2006
elections may have to be moved from early May to sometime in June to comply
with the provisions of the Electoral Act.
Mr. Chaudhry has repeatedly claimed that in rushing
through the provisional electoral rolls, the Elections Office has breached
requirements of the Electoral Act. He had threatened to take legal action if
the concerns were not addressed since failure to comply would disenfranchise
thousands of voters.
Mr. Karavaki had rubbished Labour’s claims with the remark
that Chaudhry can take his complaints, even to heaven, if he wanted it would
not have any effect on the Elections office. He accused Chaudhry of not
dealing directly with the Elections office.
But Chaudhry responded that he had written 20 letters to
the Elections office since 30 September 2005 airing his grievances regarding
the Provisional rolls in terms of errors and irregularities contained in
them.
“You cannot accuse the FLP of not bringing its concerns to
your notice. If your office, by its conduct, infringes on those rights by
its acts or omissions then it is my duty and that of the FLP as
representatives of the people to highlight these concerns and to prevent
voters being disenfranchised in the upcoming elections,” Chaudhry said.
“It is quite obvious from your media response that you are
evading to answer the FLP’s assertion that your office and the Electoral
Commission has been acting in contravention of the mandatory provisions of
the Act, with respect to the publication of the Main Rolls, the timeframe
for Objections/ Settling of Objections, the Incorrect Process with regard to
Petitions of Demonstrated Support and Inadequate Timeframe for Lists of
Preferences.
“Such conduct on your part, and that of the Electoral
Commission, assumes greater concern given the fact that you, as well as Mr.
Leung and Mr. M Sahu Khan are all senior lawyers and should be aware of the
provisions of the Act and should work within its parameters rather than
outside it.
“The elections must be held in accordance with the Act and
non compliance of that Act will attract the sanction of the Courts. I,
again, give you till the close of business this afternoon (13th March) to
address the concerns of the FLP, as per our letters, failing which we will
initiate Court proceedings to enforce your office to comply with the Act in
the processes/ conduct of elections.”
Labour’s concerns are detailed below:
• If one were to accept that Parliament would be dissolved
on 27th March, and writs for elections issued a week thereafter, this would
be around 3 - 4th April.
• The electoral rolls would then close 7 days after this
date, which would be on or about 11th April and would be subject to an
objection period.
• The objection period allows the Supervisor 14 days to
dismiss or uphold an objection (S 23) and this response would be received on
or around 25th April.
• This decision is appealable and the voter may, within 14
days of the date of the decision or within such further period, apply to the
Electoral Commission (Commission) for a review of the decision – S24(1).
This would expire on or around 9th May.
• The Commission must then make a decision within 14 days
and must make a decision in writing whether to affirm or set aside the
decision of the Supervisor of Elections – S24 (4). This would expire on or
around 23rd May.
• The publication of the final rolls would take at least a
further 14 days. This would be around the second week of June.
Such a process would, in effect, mean that the rolls would
not be finalized prior to the commencement of the polls, tentatively set for
6th May. As such, the 6-13th May elections cannot be held during that period
because to do so would be in breach of the Electoral Act and the rights of
the voter. |