Chaudhry highlights grievances of mineworkers
[posted 1 April 2006,1430]
Opposition Leader Mahendra Chaudhry said Vatukoula mine
workers had long standing grievances regarding pay, safety working and
housing conditions, environmental concerns that should to be addressed.
Speaking at the annual meeting of the Fiji Mineworkers
Union yesterday Chaudhry said safety of miners was a serious concern which
had not been addressed by the SDL government.
“All governments have a duty to ensure safety at the
mines. Failure to do so is a dereliction of duty and has to be taken very
seriously”, he said. The full text of the Leader of the Opposition’s speech
follows:
“As a person who has spent the best part of his career
pursuing the interests of and dealing with workers, it gives me immense
pleasure to be here with you today.
The Fiji Mine Workers Union and the Vatukoula gold mines
have always been a special interest case for us both as unionists and
politicians.
I, of course, have a long history of association with
Tavua and Vatukoula. My links with Vatukoula go back to the early days. Many
of you may not be aware that my first job was at the Emperor Gold Mines as a
research lab assistant – I left after a year later to join the civil service
in the Audit Department in Suva.
But then in 1978, as a trade unionist, I was appointed one
of a three-member inquiry team to investigate conditions at the Mine - pays,
working environment, housing etc.
So my links to Vatukoula and the Mines go back a long way,
some 30 years… indeed, even further back considering that I was born here
and that my father ran a regular bus service in Tavua at the time.
Yes, I have an old attachment to your workplace and home
town. That does not mean that I like what I see or what is happening to the
workers here.
In 1978, I was very upset to see the extent of worker
exploitation that was taking place at the mines, and the general social
condition of the workers. These impressions have stayed with me over time.
It pains me to realise that not much has changed over
these intervening years. You still suffer from the same old grievances – low
pays, appalling working conditions and environment, rundown housing, unsafe
drinking water - to mention a few.
Ours was one of the first inquiries into working and
living conditions at the mines. Since then there have been several – all
unfavourable - all highlighting the same basic problems I have mentioned.
Emperor Gold Mines has been operational for 70-long years
in Fiji …it has become institutionalised, almost a part of our heritage.
Yet, it continues to show a worrying lack of social responsibility towards
its workers and the town in which it is based.
I notice the recent Oxfam report raises the same age-old
issues. It recommends that Emperor, and I quote:
“Acknowledges its responsibility to address the
environmental and social issues that are a legacy of the Vatukoula mine in
Fiji.”
With these words, the report underscores the fact that the
company has a duty, a social responsibility to look after its workers and to
ensure their well being.
More specifically, the Oxfam report goes on to recommend a
living wage for the workers, ensure safety at the mines and calls for an
inquiry to be conducted into environmental pollution and health risks to
workers.
What I want to tell you today is that as workers you have
your rights which are enshrined in the Constitution.
Section 33 of the Constitution ensures that every worker
enjoys the right to fair labour practices including humane treatment and
proper working conditions.
In view of this, you certainly have legitimate grievances
which need to be addressed.
But first let me say how pleased I am that you have
revived the Mineworkers Union and that the union has already made an impact
in the manner in which it successfully negotiated recent grievances with the
company.
I refer of course to the crisis created by Emperor’s
decision to make redundant close to 400 workers on the pretext that the
increase in global oil prices had led to escalating costs which had to be
contained.
This is surprising given the fact that the company enjoys
significant concessions from government in terms of fuel costs. It pays no
duty on fuel imports.
This concession was granted in return for a commitment by
the company that it would maintain employment levels.
Now, 400 workers laid off one go is a very big number.
Particularly at a time when gold prices are at an all-time high. I am
surprised that the SDL government put no pressure on EGM to review its
decision.
But your union took strong action threatening a strike
unless the company reviewed its stand on 141 members who were laid off.
Following this, it successfully negotiated the reinstatement of 55 miners.
The other 86 agreed to accept a redundancy package offered by the company.
The sad fate of the rest of the 233 members who were laid
off, shows how important it is for workers to be unionised. The 233 who were
not reinstated were non-union members. I feel sorry for them because I know
that they have families to feed and children to send to school. But they had
the choice to join the union and they did not.
The crisis you have just emerged from was a real test of
the strength of your union and I am proud that you successfully negotiated
your way through it. You have also won a pay increase through some hard
bargaining. All of this augurs well for the future of your union.
However, this is just the beginning. I know that you have
a whole list of genuine grievances that must be addressed urgently.
The most crucial among them is safety at the mines. We are
seriously concerned that there have been three deaths at the mine in just
one year. Apart from this, there have been hundreds of injuries, some of
them quite serious, through accidents. A number of these accidents were due
to the company’s laxity in enforcing safety codes and poor safety practices
underground.
We are equally concerned at the failure of the authorities
to investigate these deaths and accidents at the mine. At the time of
fatalities and accidents a lot is heard about an investigation but
eventually everything fizzles out. If investigations are ever completed,
they are not made public.
All governments have a duty to ensure safety at the mines.
Failure to do so is a dereliction of duty and has to be taken very
seriously.
The lengthy delay in processing compensation payments is
another major grievance. It is sad that life should be taken so lightly.
There is a human factor to these things that almost always seem to be
neglected. There are families and dependents who are usually left without
any source of income when a miner dies. It is cruel and inhumane to keep
these families waiting because it merely intensifies their suffering and
hardship.
I am aware that the mining laws are grossly outdated and
need to be reviewed. Currently, there is no Occupational Health and Safety
regulations governing the mining industry. The general OHS does not apply to
mine workers because government says miners come under the Ministry of
Mineral Resources.
This is absolutely ridiculous. All matters relating to
conditions of labour and the health and safety of workers should come under
the Labour Ministry. I do not see why there are exceptions to the rule.
Mining is an extremely dangerous and hazardous occupation.
It is intolerable that there is no OHS governing the mining industry.
The environment is another major concern. Despite surveys
and reports that show high contamination of drinking water, and of rivers
and creeks from waste and other effluence from the mine, nothing has been
done to deal with this serious health risk.
USP research has shown unsafe levels of mercury and
cadmium in water samples taken from the Nasivi River which is the main
source of drinking water for the Vatukoula settlement. There have also been
reports of bacterial contamination of the river water.
The drinking water used by the Vatukoula settlement is not
treated or chlorinated and poses a major health hazard to residents. It is
absolutely unthinkable that any government would allow this.
It is well known that effluence from the mine has killed
river life and, consequently, destroyed an important source of food for many
villagers. Food crops have been contaminated by sulphur from the mines –
this is clearly visible in discolouration to leaves and plants in the area.
How the company could have been allowed to get away with
such irresponsible behaviour is absolutely unthinkable?
It is more than obvious we have a government in office
that makes a lot of noise about its commitment to people, the indigenous
Fijian community in particular, but takes no action to ensure their health
and lives are not endangered by the anti-social and anti-environmental
practices of companies that operate in Fiji.
You have my assurances that a Labour government will take
firm and urgent steps to deal with all these problems both environmental and
social.
We will as a matter of priority make appropriate
amendments to the current Mining Act and more specifically to the
Occupational Health and Safety regulations to ensure that mining operations
are fully covered.
We will review the current Workmen’s Compensation Act to
raise the current maximum payout of $24,000 in compensation to more
realistic levels. This is totally unacceptable.
It is atrocious that the life of a fully able bodied
person is merely tagged at $24,000. We will speed up the processing of
payments.
There will also have to be an environmental impact study
to identify the possible adverse effects of mining on the environment and
the residents of Vatukoula.
In the final analysis, Emperor must be commended for its
contribution to the economy of Fiji and for providing much-needed employment
to our people in the 70 years of its operations here. It is also heartening
to note that it is now consulting more closely with your union on its plans
to restructure the operations.
However, there are a number of long standing grievances of
the workers that appear to have received no attention from the company.
These have to be addressed and a fair solution found.
The company has been changing hands fairly rapidly and so
has its top management. This creates an atmosphere of uncertainty and
instability regarding EGM’s operations which is not very healthy.
We are also concerned that while it is claiming declining
profits in Fiji and cutting down on employment, the company is extending its
operations to Papua New Guinea.
Emperor has received very favourable treatment from the
Fiji government in terms of tax holidays and other concessions. In return,
it has certain social responsibilities that it must take seriously.
Having said that, I note the current good relations
between the union and the company and hope that this will continue so that
you can amicably settle long-standing grievances that have plagued mine
workers for so long.
Finally, my message to you as workers is one of
solidarity. You have already witnessed what can be achieved through a strong
and united front.
Those workers who failed to join the union, are today out
of a job. This should give you greater determination to ensure that you
maintain your solidarity and the strength of your union.
It is only through a strong united front that workers can
safeguard their collective rights.
In a few weeks time, you will be going to the polls to
vote for the next government. I hope you will exercise your right to vote
with caution and intelligence to ensure that a government you vote into
office will work in your interests and protect the rights of workers.
With those words, I wish you well and may your union
continue from strength to strength in safeguarding your rights." |