$84 million valuation for Natadola Resort absurd
[posted 11 May 2010,1345]
Why is the luxurious 5-star Natadola Bay Resort being
under-valued at $84 million by the Fiji National Provident Fund?
In its shocking disclosure of a $301million write off on
the Natadola Resort project last week, the Fund’s Chief Executive Aisake
Taito and Chairman Ajith Kodagoda revealed that international valuers had
put the market value of the resort at $84 million.
This seems an absurd valuation for a luxury five-star
300-plus room hotel of Natadola’s reputation. It has not been said whether
the valuation includes the internationally rated golf course and the
residential lots.
Even without, the figure is questionable considering that
experts put the current construction cost (post devaluation) for a five-star
hotel room at about $0.5million per room.
No details were released on who carried out the valuation
and the credentials of the firm involved. We were simply told that an
“international valuation” put the value at $84 million.
The FLP has written to the CEO of the Fund, Mr Aisake
Taito, expressing its concerns at what appears to be a gross under-valuation
of the resort.
We have asked for a copy of the valuation report and for
the credentials of the valuers.
The full text of our letter to FNPF is
given below:
7 May 2010
Mr Aisake Taito
Chief Executive
Fiji National Provident Fund
Private Mail Bag
Suva
Dear Sir
re: the Natadola Bay Resorts Ltd
I notice from statements made to the media by yourself and
the Chairman of FNPF Mr Ajith Kodagoda that international valuers had put
the market value of the Natadola Resort at $84 million.
This seems an absurd valuation for a luxury five-star
300-plus room hotel of Natadola’s reputation. Does the valuation include the
internationally rated golf course and the residential lots or is the
valuation just for the hotel itself?
I shall be grateful if the valuation report can be made
public in view of the questions that are now being raised regarding the
credibility of this valuation report. My information is that a valuation of
the hotel commissioned by the FNPF in 2008, at a time when the hotel complex
was only 60% complete, had put its value in excess of $230 million.
How does one explain such a huge discrepancy in the two
valuation reports? I am also curious about the value of the Momi Bay
development (or whatever is left of it) in the books of FNPF. Was this
property also valued by the same firm of international valuers?
There is a great deal of anxiety about the $84 million
valuation. Who are these valuers? What method of valuation did they use?
These are same of the questions being asked.
We ourselves have been informed by experts in the tourism
industry that present day construction costs, taking account of the
devaluation, for a five star hotel room average around $0.5million.
On that basis, the Natadola Resort should be worth no less
than $170 million, excluding the golf course and the residential lots.
We cannot let this matter go unchallenged as it has huge
implications on the future safety and security of FNPF funds. It also calls
to question whether the business of the Fund is conducted in a transparent
manner.
There is speculation in some circles, albeit
unsubstantiated, that the resort has been deliberately grossly undervalued
so as to facilitate its sale at a later date to a favoured buyer.
The value of the resort having been substantially written
down, the impropriety of the sale at well-below the actual market value of
the property cannot then be questioned. What is alleged is that the ground
is being prepared for that to materialise.
Members of the fund do not appear to be satisfied with the
official explanation given by the Attorney General and the management of the
Fund. There appears to be a lot more to it than has so far surfaced.
In the circumstances, I shall be grateful if you will
forward me a copy of the valuation report of the Natadola development, with
the credentials of the valuers.
I shall also be grateful to be informed of the value of
the Momi Bay Resort development in the books of the FNPF.
I would appreciate an early response from you, in view of
the importance of this matter to the general public of Fiji.
Yours faithfully
Mahendra P. Chaudhry
General Secretary
Member FNPF |