Budget 2012
[posted 25 Nov 2011,1445]
The 2012 Budget will destabilize State finances and will most likely lead to
increases in indirect taxes to offset the huge reductions in personal and
corporate tax rates.
Corporate tax rates have been slashed from
28% to 20% while middle and high income workers should see big increases in
their take home pay as tax rates plunge from 31%, to as low as 7% for those
in the lower pay bracket.
This is likely to raise smiles all around
but it should be realized that the move will have serious implications on
Government revenue. As such, there will be a price to pay for the $53m
giveaway to the people.
Already, the 15% Hotel Turnover Tax has
been extended to include restaurants, cinema houses, rental cars and other
tourist related activities. However, local residents will also be affected
as major users of these services. A 2% a month levy has been imposed on
outstanding balances on credit cards, increased tax on luxury cars, higher
price for imported canned fish.
Other details on increased indirect taxes
will only be revealed once the Budget supplementary is made available – it
is still not out, according to informed sources.
The tax rebates may have been prompted by
a need to stimulate consumer spending in the current depressed business
environment but will most certainly fuel inflation.
The announcement on the FNPF Decree and
pension cuts is outrageous. It was unilaterally imposed without any
consideration given to other options that were available. It is certainly
most irresponsible for the Board of the FNPF to force members to pay the
price for its own highly questionable and imprudent policies and decisions
which have led to massive losses on the investment front, running into
hundreds of millions of dollars.
Furthermore, putting out a decree when a case is pending in the Courts,
shows disrespect to the rule of law and the Judiciary.
The pay rise to the civil service has long
been overdue and is welcomed. However, one questions the discriminatory
policy of giving a 9% increase to the Police Force when others receive only
3%. Considering that civil servants have not been given a pay rise in
five years, the increase could have been higher.
Likewise, the increased allocations to the
Health and Education Ministries are welcomed.
Budget 2012 makes no reference to the
State’s ballooning debt levels. One must also question the total lack of
accountability in government’s handling of public funds. Government accounts
and financial statements are no longer available for public scrutiny nor are
the Auditor General’s reports made public. In his 2012 Budget address, the
interim Prime Minister and Minister of Finance refers to a need for
accountability but is ironically unaware of a noticeable lack of
accountability and transparency in his government’s management of public
funds.
More on Budget 2012 as details are made
available.
LRV |